Jump to content
  • Join the online East Midlands astronomy club today!

    With active forums, two dark sites and a knowledgeable membership, East Midlands Stargazers has something for everyone.

Most confused about IR


Stu

Recommended Posts

Hi folks. I was looking at getting the IR filter removed from my DSLR, simple enough. Then I was looking at light pollution filters, in particular the IDAS LPS P3. In the description it quotes "The filter also blocks infrared so a separate IR blocking filter is not needed". Is the LPS filter not something you would use on certain targets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The IR filter in the camera is a different beast to the P3 (or other LP filters). Since optics are generally designed for visual use, the IR comes to a focus at a different point to visible light but since the eye can't see IR then it doesn't really matter. But a camera sensor can, so an IR filter is needed to avoid blurring the image.  The IR filter in cameras is generally designed to replicate the response of the human eye (so you get colour photos that appear as they would visually) so it also significantly attenuates the Ha wavelength.  The P3 (and other LP filters) has a very sharp IR cutoff that is above the Ha wavelength. So basically the P3 will not produce a 'visually correct' colour image as it rejects parts of the visible spectrum (those predominantly generated by LP sources) whilst passing other bits of the spectum than the eye is not very sensitive to. But all images can be tweaked during post processing to some extent to get the desired effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Clive said:

The IR filter in the camera is a different beast to the P3 (or other LP filters). Since optics are generally designed for visual use, the IR comes to a focus at a different point to visible light but since the eye can't see IR then it doesn't really matter. But a camera sensor can, so an IR filter is needed to avoid blurring the image.  The IR filter in cameras is generally designed to replicate the response of the human eye (so you get colour photos that appear as they would visually) so it also significantly attenuates the Ha wavelength.  The P3 (and other LP filters) has a very sharp IR cutoff that is above the Ha wavelength. So basically the P3 will not produce a 'visually correct' colour image as it rejects parts of the visible spectrum (those predominantly generated by LP sources) whilst passing other bits of the spectum than the eye is not very sensitive to. But all images can be tweaked during post processing to some extent to get the desired effect.

Thank you, that's definitely cleared that up for me. So much to learn 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.