Sheila Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 now at 20 x 300s Ha 6 x 300s Oiii 6 x 300s Sii think there is more detail but please tell me if i am doing the processing wrong or anything, you dont have to be polite http://www.astrobin.com/47207/ also Tried another hubble Sheila Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kheldar Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 (edited) There is no such thing as wrong when it comes to narrowband Looks good to me either way! Edited July 7, 2013 by Kheldar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Ibbo Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 yes the extra data helps a lot I would (and have) done another couple of curves and run it through Neat image and crop out the corner not sure what has happened in bottom left corner -did it not line up? I have not played with the colour image Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheila Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 (edited) i finally got round to making the camera square to the scope so i age on second set of data is rotated about 30 degrees from first, hence the corners. That should not happen again hopefully now its set up correctly. I dont have neat image? what does it actually do? sheila Edited July 7, 2013 by Sheila Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kheldar Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 (edited) Sorry but don't think the problems in the corner are related to rotation - assuming were talking about centipedes? Edited July 7, 2013 by Kheldar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheila Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 (edited) Sorry but don't think the problems in the corner are related to rotation - assuming were talking about centipedes? i assumed Steve was talking about the triangles in the corners where the image is rotated as i moved the position of the chip for the second 10 subs? will take another look Edited July 7, 2013 by Sheila Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kheldar Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 (edited) i assumed Steve was talking about the triangles in the corners where the image is rotated as i moved the position of the chip for the second 10 subs? will take another look I can't see the triangles, ignore me Edited July 7, 2013 by Kheldar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheila Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 look at the hubble one in the corners..... line runs across diagonally in the corners... thought that might be giving the effect you are looking at, the data there is only from the first night which as a bit iffy haze wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Ibbo Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 yes its the rotation between different nights that dis it neat image was the smoothing program I showed you last week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheila Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 yes its the rotation between different nights that dis it neat image was the smoothing program I showed you last week yes i remember that one now.... was getting confused with names Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dawson Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Lovely. Looks just like the moon on a cloudy night. Very romantic. James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now