Jump to content
  • Join the online East Midlands astronomy club today!

    With active forums, two dark sites and a knowledgeable membership, East Midlands Stargazers has something for everyone.

Dawes limit


dawson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fascinating article in the January 2014 Astronomy Now on the Dawes limit; resolving power of a scope to separate two close stars.

Dawes was born in 1799 and spent a lot of time resolving doubles.

He got a load of his mates to try and separate doubles with their own telescopes, and used the data to work out a formula of the resolving power of telescopes of given aperture. His formula is:

R = 116 / D

Where R is the Dawes limit, and D the aperture in mm [i'm not sure he would have used mm but hey]. The limit is measures in arcseconds.

Interestingly as optics have improved, with coatings and the like, it appears we can now separate closer objects with any given aperture.

The article concludes by asking readers to attempt to separate some suggested doubles and to submit their findings along with the info on their scope; repeating Dawes' experiment.

One of the more interesting articles in this months journal; i wasn't so interested in eight articles on how hydrogen formed in the big bang.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've spent a lot of time viewing and imaging the brighter double stars. In practice, the Dawes limit is very difficult to achieve. When I get there or nearly there, it is usually with high magnification. I'm aiming to bag a few doubles with a DSLR and ST80 and Skymax 127.


 


I have to admit I don't buy any magazines these days thanks to the <expletives> that caused the recession and put my job in jeopardy but there's Astronomy Wise, which is free:


 


http://www.astronomywise.com/magazine/


 


There is a certain writer who contributes but it's not an advert, as the writers don't get paid.


 


I prefer to read "how to" articles myself but do find the more theoretical articles interesting, too. It's a case of balance. I DO, however, think that most "beginner" astronomy  books have too much information about the Big Bang and not enough about what really matters, like trying to find Jupiter, etc, etc.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

The list:


 


epsilon Bootis, 2.85 arch seconds


zeta Bootis 0.7 arc seconds


eta Orionis 1.7 arc seconds


14 Orionis 0.7 arc seconds


xi Ursa Majoris 1.7 arc seconds


gamma Virginis (Porrima) 1.0 arc seconds


 


Encke Gap in Saturn's rings 0.7 arc seconds at opposition.


 


Submit findings to:


 


editorial2014@astronomynow.com


 


JD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.