Popular Post +Ibbo Posted January 31, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted January 31, 2016 (edited) WO 132 (capped down) with SX 694 ha only 19 x 1800s needs a lot more Edited January 31, 2016 by Ibbo +Bino-viewer, +Graham, Werisit and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perkil8r Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 I like that, but where's the colour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyaardvark Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Very nice. Not an object I'm familiar with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philjay Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Loads of structure in there, very nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Steve pulls it out the bag again. Awesome shot of a pretty unfamiliar object. Didn't we see this visually Steve one cold night down Sawley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daz Type-R Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 That is a beauty Steve, nicely done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweedledee Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 (edited) That looks lovely Steve. Do you mean mean 19x180s not 19x1800s? Don't think you did half hour subs 40 minutes ago, Doc said: Steve pulls it out the bag again. Awesome shot of a pretty unfamiliar object. Didn't we see this visually Steve one cold night down Sawley? Must be great to see that visually! Did you see just two blobs or anything more? Edited January 31, 2016 by Tweedledee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Now you are asking Pete. I'll try and find my report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Graham Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Awesome stuff Steve. Not an easy target that one. I know I have tried and failed miserably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAZ Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 I like that Steve, not a usual suspect. Apparently it's mag 14, so if that's total surface brightness it's going to be a tricky one to get visually. Then on the other hand if it's fairly small it may well be fairly concentrated and stand out well like M57 does. This might be a clue to how difficult it is. http://deepskypedia.com/wiki/Jones-Emberson_1 Tweedledee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Ibbo Posted January 31, 2016 Author Share Posted January 31, 2016 (edited) thanks Yes I do mean 30 mins subs and I forot to ay binned 2x2 (well most of then 14) the only time I remember seeing it was at an early equinox start party held at Dower house through a 18 or 20 " dob Edited January 31, 2016 by Ibbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweedledee Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 36 minutes ago, Ibbo said: thanks Yes I do mean 30 mins subs and I forot to ay binned 2x2 (well most of then 14) the only time I remember seeing it was at an early equinox start party held at Dower house through a 18 or 20 " dob Crikey it is faint! I won't bother trying for a 5 minute jpeg of it from iTelescope then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Very nice Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now