Jump to content
  • Join the online East Midlands astronomy club today!

    With active forums, two dark sites and a knowledgeable membership, East Midlands Stargazers has something for everyone.

Eyepiece advice


Guest chrishewett

Recommended Posts

Guest chrishewett

Question number one!

I have a skywatcher 200mm f/5, one super 10 long eye relief ep and one super 25 wideangle long eye relief ep. I also have a 2"eyepiece adapter but no 2" eps. No barlow lens.

Can I have some advice as to how these will perform and what I need to improve the range.

As these came with the scope I assume they are skywatcher.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris.

If these are anything like the 2 standard ep's I got with my Skywatcher 200P, then I hated the 10mm, found the eye relief next to useless, plus the views through it were not that good.

On the flip side, the 25mm was ok, not great, but better than the 10mm one. I stuck with the 25mm one for nearly a year and bought a cheap barlow to get it down to 12.5mm, never used the 10.

But to be honest, I would ditch both of them and get some decent quality ep's, you will not be dissapointed. Unfortunatly in this game, the more they cost, the better they tend to be.

BUT (there is all ways a but) what suits one person may not suit the next, ep's are a personal thing, you either love em or hate em.

If on a budget, I would look to upgrade to the BST Explorer ep's from Sky's the limit, £45-50 a ep and will be a massive improvemnt over the stock ep's. You can even "buy" say 5-6 at a time on a trial period and return the ones you dont want for a "refund", so basically, only paying for the ones you keep.

Next you could look at a Badder Hyperion Zoom, this is a 8-24mm ep in one, currently costs about £175, I have one of these and love it!

Next up is the Celestron X-cels, loads of good reviews, not used/seen them myself, also there are the Meade 2000, 3000 etc series ep's, again, decent reviews.

After that you are into TeleVue teratory, very expensive but very, very good, the Naglers are circa £500 a ep!!!!!!!!

Your best bet will be to get to a stargazing event, either ours at Belper or the ELAC meetings near Skegness at Gib point and look through someones else's ep's in your scope, we dont mind, that way you can "try before you buy".

As for barlows, again, some love em, some hate em, me personally, I don't want to use one, if I ever went down that route, I would throw £100 at a Televue Powermate, does the same as a barlow, but miles, miles better quality.

Any further queations fire away and happy hunting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with regards to your question on range, range is not really that important, to increase the range, you need a more powerfull ep, a 4mm ep will make the object look bigger in the fov (Field Of View) than a 25mm ep will.

This is called magnification.

To work out the magnification of a given ep, you need to divide the focal length in mm of your scope (so if you have a F5 200P, your focal length must be 1000mm - 1000mm divided by 200mm =5) by the focal length of your ep, so a 4mm ep in your scope will be.....

1000mm / 4mm = 250. So the magnification of a 4mm ep in your scope will be 250 times mag.

In this country, it is possible that that much magnification will just result in a blury image in the ep, as well as incresing the object you are looking at, you will also increas all the atmospheric distortions and turbulance that goes with it, so you see, magnification is not everything!

Personally, but this is just my opion, I would not try and push your magnification above 200x mag, any more the quality will degrade.

To me, a smaller sharper image is better than a large blury image!

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll third the Hyperion Zoom, absolutley awesome, versatile eyepiece :)

Also just for the record (in my opinion) Kim (BrantUK) is the reason why most of us have a Hyperion Zoom LOL! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll third the Hyperion Zoom, absolutley awesome, versatile eyepiece :)

Also just for the record (in my opinion) Kim (BrantUK) is the reason why most of us have a Hyperion Zoom LOL! ;)

Yep, all Kim's fault, I still say he has shares in Badder!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also google CCDCalc - it's got a good fov simulator that you can install and run independent of t'internet - totally free :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest chrishewett

Thanks for the good advice. I thought it would cost money!

I like the idea of the Baader hyperion. I will try out my present eps to get used to the scope then decide what to buy, probably a couple of better quality eps and then the baader.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll also recommend the Baarder Hyperion 8-24mm click stop zoom, I love mine. Don't get too hung up on too high a magnification, as Daz has said you may get bigger images but in less than perfect seeing conditions (atmospheric turbulence) the bigger image will becpme blurred and less sharp. Also the field of view will get so small that it can become difficult to find things in the sky. An example of this was looking at Saturn through the BH zoom, ramping it up to the 8mm stop gave a blurry image the best image for sharpness, size and contrast was at the 12mm stop. I also have a BH 5mm EP which if the conditions are absolutely perfect then the views are great but in reality it seldom gets used because of the generally less than perfect seeing conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Does abyone have any experience with the Meade 4000 8-24 zoom?

https://www.google.co.uk/shopping/product/6371112848159938955?hl=en&q=meade%204000%20zoom&oq=meade+4000+zoom&gs_l=products-cc.3...2230.7682.0.8112.17.7.1.9.10.0.90.529.7.7.0...0.0...1ac.1.9ryW6GvAjhI&sa=X&ei=Yl8sUdLpO8jV0QXo4YCoAg&ved=0CDYQ8wIwAA#hsec:overview

How does it compare to the BH zoom? It's half the price but is it half as good and is half as good good enough?

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a SaN review the Meade was just beaten by the BH mostly on internal reflections iirc - though it was pretty comparable. The worst one was the Skywatcher and the best was the Pentax. If we get to coincide at a session you can try mine out and see what you think James. :)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.